Respond to This
Barely being polite...
So I recently joined this cooking site. It's over all a pretty good site, but I'm starting to get annoyed with some of the guys that consider themselves to be the "big dogs" over there.
They jump into threads they have no interest in commenting on, and instead seem to just want to "spank" people who get "uppity", and who don't conform to the way they want things done.
For instance, I just started a new thread after searching the forum for similar threads, and finding out that the last one on a similar topic was over a year old. However, thinking that this topic could be one of those of the "picks vs. fingers" variety, as in done to death, I said so in the beginning of my initial post, but also explained that I had taken the time to search.
Well, this guy jumps in there and takes me to task for not "bumping the original thread." I explained to him that this is not how it is done in the forums I am used to hanging out at, because almost no one wants to jump into a year old thread with hundreds of responses already posted. I also told him I would be happy to adhere to the norm, if this is the way it is done on this site.
He replied with "Bumping up old topics is usually the preferred method on most forums because it keeps the amount of threads about the same topic down, and also because there are often times a lot of good info in old threads and people don't want to post the same things over and over again."
First, what does he care about the amount of threads? He's not a site administrator. Second, in the world of cooking, new stuff comes around all the time, just as in the world of bass playing. Therefore, a thread entitled "Best New Bass for...?" might have different answers today than it would have had a year ago. Same in the world of cooking. Third, who (who has info to post) hasn't posted the same info over and over again? Fourth, what does he know about most forums?
Am I overreacting? Perhaps, but I object to his use of the words "usually" and "most", and in context and in light of his other posts, trust me, he (and others) really seems like an arrogant @%$&$@#$! This guy has lectured me a couple of times before, and I am getting quite tired of it.
Why am I posting this over here? First, because I need to vent, if I am to keep my cool over there.
Second, and most importantly, I hope I have never acted this way toward a fellow member of this site.
If you feel as though I have, please accept my abject apologies. Also, feel free to tell me about it in this thread. I'm a big boy, and I can take it without lashing out in return. Though I have strong convictions, and express them, my main concern is to help everyone to be the best bass player they can be.
For those of you who may be out there, and are now snickering and saying "It's about time he got his comeuppance", perhaps you're right.
However, regarding being a "big dog" and a site bully, I really don't want to act or be perceived as being this way.
Kelly
Responses
[ Pages:
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 ] |
|
Respond to this
Re: Barely being polite...
6/15/2006 11:12 PM
Kelly Marsh (11455) wrote:
So here's how I replied:
I assume from your statement that you are, and have been a member of many sites, and for quite a long time. Please excuse my relatively little experience in this regard. I have only been a member of such sites for a little less than a decade, and have only subscribed a to dozen or so.
This site apparently works differently to the ones with which I am familiar; I will bow to your wisdom, as I am a mere stripling of forty-eight.
So anyway, do you have any preferences as to gadgets?
Kelly
Okay, I'm a real so & so. If I'd had your help, I might have been able to do better.
Kelly
|
|

|  |
Respond to this
Re: Barely being polite...
6/16/2006 8:37 AM
Sean Benedik (4277) wrote:
That's a good reply. If the sarcasm doesn't get him your appeal to his expertise on gadgets might stoke his ego enough to get a productive reply.
|
|
Respond to this
Re: Barely being polite...
6/16/2006 1:04 AM
Ivan Thuringer (40974) wrote:
Just tell him to shut his donut-hole up and get back to dunkin' them. People who are asses on forums have the tendency of pretending to be something they really aren't.
|
|

|  |
Respond to this
Re: Barely being polite...
6/16/2006 6:11 AM
Kelly Marsh (11455) wrote:
Thanks, Ivan.
I always respect and appreciate your opinion, and for me, that is saying quite a lot. I still wish you'd let me cuss out... well, never mind. ;)
Kelly
|
|
Respond to this
Re: Barely being polite...
6/16/2006 1:10 AM
WILLIAM HULSEY (25101) wrote:
Ditto what Ivan said. Have you checked your inbox? I have a message for you...get to it, man! Hahaha!
Yes, I do think some people take themselves a bit too seriously at times.
Bo
|
|

|  |
Respond to this
Re: Barely being polite...
6/16/2006 3:08 AM
Kelly Marsh (11455) wrote:
Hey Bo,
Yeah, sorry. I'll take a look at it when I'm in a better frame of mind. Trust me, you don't want me tearing it apart right now!
Sorry, still don't mean to be a &^$#&, and you certainly don't deserve it. Just give me a little time, okay? I'm still steamed, and I don't want to take it out on my friends.
Kelly
|
|
Respond to this
Re: Barely being polite...
6/16/2006 1:13 AM
Howard Miller (6142) wrote:
All too common I'm afraid. Try working in the IT business... the
number of scary sociophobes you come across on the net is
incredible.
Just think though - I bet you anything that the dude giving you a
hard time is a 40-something, obese virgin :-)
|
|

|  |
Respond to this
Re: Barely being polite...
6/16/2006 3:20 AM
Kelly Marsh (11455) wrote:
Howard,
LOL! I just got out of a situation where I had to work with a totally worthless IT guy! I realize what you meant was probably from the opposite end; sorry, and no offense meant.
As to the age and sexual accomplishment range, I think you are probably right, except I think you are about a decade low regarding the age.
Anyway, I'm sure the guy is compensating for something. If he has enough money, I'm fairly confident he drives a Viper. Girls, the line forms here.
Kelly
|
|

|  | 
|  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 
|  |
Respond to this
Re: Barely being polite...
6/16/2006 8:08 AM
Kelly Marsh (11455) wrote:
Kelvin,
I'm not talking about the pic on your homepage. Truth be told, I am no longer into that stuff, and I don't know who it is, nor do I care. I'm from the Joe Weider era, and all my heroes are now old men, just like me.
The only point I was trying to make is if you lift as much as you seem to, (and I can tell) you are probably a good deal wider than your fellow human-beings, a state I can identify with even after planned atrophy. And before you ask, no, I was never in competition. I never bulked up that well, and I've always been kind of a fat S.O.B., but I have broad shoulders, no neck, good biceps, lats, and all the rest that goes with my physique, and if you poke me in the belly it's as hard as a rock, though it hangs over my belt buckle. I'm one of those guys who should have a huge mustache and no hair, like the vintage "strong men" in the old circuses.
Kelly
|
|

|  |
Respond to this
Re: Barely being polite...
6/18/2006 4:23 AM
WILLIAM HULSEY (25101) wrote:
Yeah, we've probably got a few of those on here. I can think of one individual I'd like to see go or learn to behave himself.
Still, for as much traffic as we get here, it's not too bad.
Bo
|
|
More Responses
[ Pages:
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 ]
|