Respond to This

In the news.......(with apologies to Budweiser drinkers)

Hopping mad over World Cup beer deal
Roger Boyes, Berlin
May 23, 2006

IT is brown-gold and alcoholic but, then, in the scathing verdict of German beer fans, so is paint thinner.

The Germans are furious that Budweiser will be the official tipple for the soccer World Cup.

The American lager has secured a near-monopoly of beer sales inside World Cup stadiums and within a 500m radius of the grounds, supplanting more than 1270 domestic breweries. And what most upsets the fans is that Budweiser - advertised as the "King of Beers" in the US - fails to meet the ancient German standards for purity, which stipulate that beer can be brewed only from malt, hops and water.

Budweiser uses rice in its production process and therefore fails to qualify as a beer in the German sense.

Budweiser's World Cup status is a slap in the face for a country that attaches such importance to beer production. When Germany was a patchwork of principalities and duchies, a sponsored brewery was seen as the stamp of independence.

"Most pubs don't even stock it," groaned Walter Konig, of the Bavarian Breweries Association. "Bavarian beer should be available in a Bavarian stadium - Munich - for the first kick-off.

"But what can we do? Budweiser paid $US40million for the concession even before Germany had been chosen to host the tournament."

Franz Maget, a Bavarian Social Democrat, has called Budweiser "the worst beer in the world".

This is more than a slanging match between brewers - it has become a kind of guerilla warfare for trademark lawyers.

One German beer, Bitburger, will be allowed some sales space in the stadiums when the tournament starts next month.

Since the Czech brewery Budweiser Budvar, which makes a stronger brew, contests the right of the Americans to use the name Budweiser in Germany, only the name "Bud" can be displayed.

But "Bud" sounds like "Bit", the name used by Bitburger. Budweiser's owners, Anheuser-Busch, have therefore had to allow some sales of Bit alongside Bud.

However German sensitivites were spared when protests from British World War II veteran forced David and Victoria Beckham to cancel a fly-past of Battle of Britain vintage aircraft as part of their weekend pound stg. 500,000 ($1.24 million) cup party.

Indeed the charity gala held at the Beckham's Sawbridgeworth mansion in Hertfordshire was a bit of washout, despite the presence of celebrities such as Australian super model Elle Macpherson, England star Wayne Rooney, and the Duchess of York and her daughter Princess Beatrice.

The Times

Responses  [ Pages: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 ]
Respond to this

Re: In the news.......(with apologies to Budweiser drinkers)

5/23/2006 9:16 AM

Mike Hokkanen (27043) wrote:

Corporate money talks. Nothing says "endorse me" like cash!



Respond to this

Re: In the news.......(with apologies to Budweiser drinkers)

5/23/2006 11:00 AM

Michael Holzammer (24135) wrote:

Exactly!

See my post below.

Respond to this

Re: In the news.......(with apologies to Budweiser drinkers)

5/23/2006 9:58 AM

Jens Zastrow (3706) wrote:

Budweiser is a wonderful softdrink. ;-p



Respond to this

Re: In the news.......(with apologies to Budweiser drinkers)

5/23/2006 10:58 AM

Michael Holzammer (24135) wrote:

Nah, it lacks taste and is way to expensive. :-P



Respond to this

Re: In the news.......(with apologies to Budweiser drinkers)

5/23/2006 12:35 PM

Brent Williams (5402) wrote:

it's no more expensive than a soft drink

we're just used to seeing those stupid a-- taxes on the beer that we've accepted it

government won... we lost...

cigarettes cost rougly 3x what they would without taxes, gasoline about 2x

honestly i think canada pays less tax



Respond to this

Re: In the news.......(with apologies to Budweiser drinkers)

5/23/2006 12:54 PM

Paul Warren (15294) wrote:

honestly i think canada pays less tax

Not a chance Brent. Canada may not do many things well but we're world leaders when it comes to taxation. :-(



Respond to this

Re: In the news.......(with apologies to Budweiser drinkers)

5/23/2006 1:47 PM

Brent Williams (5402) wrote:

was a badly formed joke on my part.

sorrys :D

we'll allways have that Robin Williams song and dance skit "Blame Canada"



Respond to this

Re: In the news.......(with apologies to Budweiser drinkers)

5/23/2006 1:56 PM

Paul Warren (15294) wrote:

I didn't take it the wrong way Brent, I was just trying to joke about our ridiculous tax levels here. I don't think there are many countries with a higher overall level of taxation or a lower level of service. It's a national pastime to complain about it.



Respond to this

Re: In the news.......(with apologies to Budweiser drinkers)

5/23/2006 3:16 PM

Brian Sharpe (21051) wrote:

The true north strong and free - not if Revenue Canada has anything to say about it! LOL

Respond to this

Re: In the news.......(with apologies to Budweiser drinkers)

5/23/2006 10:43 AM

Brent Williams (5402) wrote:

i don't know how it's made, but i'm pretty hell bent on Heinekan or Amstel. Dunno if they sell Amstel here, never seen it. We should have it tho.

Budweiser and most beers over here in America kinda suck

If a bar doesn't have Heinekan I'll ask for a Corona or just do without.




Respond to this

Re: In the news.......(with apologies to Budweiser drinkers)

5/23/2006 1:01 PM

Dave Magaro (21058) wrote:

*Dave wipes tear from eye*

If I walk into a bar and they don't have Heineken, they lose a customer... I just leave. Even at a gig I've run into this. We were playing this one Hole and they didn't have Heineken. I wipped out some cash and sent two of the boys wives to another bar to grab a couple of six packs and bring back.

Dave



Respond to this

Re: In the news.......(with apologies to Budweiser drinkers)

5/23/2006 1:46 PM

Brent Williams (5402) wrote:

lol finally someone understands me!

More Responses  [ Pages: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 ]