Respond to this
Re: King Crimson
4/11/2002 12:19 PM
Kyle Partridge (313) wrote:
Hi Matt,
I'm a huge Crimson fan. Seems like Crimson fans tend to be divided into groups - those who are into the super old stuff belonging to one group, and those into the newer stuff in another. But that's a generalization of course. There are some that span the three "phases" of Crimson.
I am most excited about the double-trio stuff onward (so basically all albums after VRROOM). I also like the improvisational stuff a good deal (The Projeckts and ThrakAttak). Well, that and "Three of a Perfect Pair". Crimson is complex, melodic, harmonic, dissonant, groovy - they do it all. Adrian supplies humor and fun, to an otherwise quite serious line up. But if you don't like music that consumes your brain as well as your heart, it's not for you.
The beauty of Crimson though, is that it is complex and interesting, as well as moving. So, you can hear something new in it all the time, no matter how long you've been a listener.
Personally, although I do like Yes and Rush, and other "prog" bands, I'm not sure I'd put Crimson in the same category with them. Sure, they belong together in terms of the complexity of their music. But Crimson is more ambient and more improvisational than bands like Yes or Rush. Anybody else a fan who knows what I mean?
Kyle
ps - I also really like "Walking on Air". Great bassline!
|